Our works include the following:
- Implementation of priority and short-term activities to raise public
awareness, involve Municipalities and local actors, demonstrate quick
results, and ensure credibility. - Involve residents and water users, through their representatives, as
key actors solving water issues by adapting their practices (in terms
of water use efficiency and pollution control); - Bring together central agencies, local authorities, and representatives
from residents and water users, and teach them to coordinate and
work collaboratively; - Clarify roles and responsibilities and reduce overlaps and gaps;
- Ensure buy-in and commitment to the decisions; and
- Build capacity of all parties, improve performance and accountability.
Other tasks include the development of a realistic and focused Action Plan,
which would:
Present a deliberate choice of activities to achieve specific goals, with
clear implementation roles, allocated staff and resources, quantified
targets and timetables, and monitoring mechanisms; and
Be developed and implemented along with representatives of water
users and residents, i.e. Municipalities, business/industrial
associations, farmer groups and other nongovernmental
representative entities.
Case Studies
When undertaking a project, goods and services are consumed as well as produced, while social, economic and environmental
impacts occur. In the same time, the economic efficiency should be studied to ensure feasible values for public investment, which
means that the benefits must outweigh the costs of using scare resources, benefits being the total positive effects while cos ts
represent the total negative effects measured in economic terms. The cost-benefit analysis in our reports/case studies examine
whether the automation process together with the generation of power at source i.e. using pumps as turbines (PAT’s technologies) is
economically more efficient than connecting to the power Grid and generate power to nearby pump stations .